Useful Perhaps

"What I'm use to isn't useful anymore."
~Duawne Starling, singer/songwriter



Enneagram Profile

I took my first Enneagram test. These were the results. I'm a social 8 with 7 in the wing, with an almost matching level of tendency toward 2, which is supposedly the direction of integration and growth for me. Leslie seems to think they are accurate (I had her critique my answers to the questions before I submitted them). It's good to see I have grown a little over the years (better able to express my 2 tendencies).

Enneagram Test Results
Type 1 Perfectionism: The Reformer
|||||||||| 38%
Type 2 Helpfulness: The Helper
|||||||||||||||||| 78%
Type 3 Image Focus: The Achiever
|||||||||||||| 58%
Type 4 Hypersensitivity: The Individualist
|||| 14%
Type 5 Detachment: The Investigator
|||||| 30%
Type 6 Anxiety: The Loyalist
|||||||||||| 42%
Type 7 Adventurousness: The Enthusiast
|||||||||||||||| 62%
Type 8 Aggressiveness: The Challenger
|||||||||||||||||| 78%
Type 9 Calmness: The Peacemaker
|||||||||||||| 58%
Your main type is 8
Your variant is sexual


Main Type
Overall Self


***Update: I was wrong. My guess was that Leslie is a 5 with 6 in the wing, which She tested as a 1. The more I read about how 8s and 1s tend to interact, the more plausible it sounds. She said she'd let me look over her answers, as she did mine. We'll see.

This information is a composite of these site: The Enneagram Institute and SimilarMinds.com

Labels: , ,



Breaking My Heart

One of the most troubling things happening in my life of late is that so many of my friends are either divorcing, cheating on one another or otherwise putting each other through hell. It's killing me. A friend of mine just had her indiscretions of a year ago put on blast. Now she's trying to deal with the fall out. It's a mess. Institutional religion all too often gives us only two categories in which to understand indiscretion and/or brokenness: victim or victimizer. Thus, when one's brokenness is discovered, everyone, including the principal players, seems to rush to take up sides against the category they despise the most. It's awful. In the meantime, little or no healing takes place, because we're not taught how to seek that for the good of each other. Instead, the principal players retreat into self-interest--"I have to protect... love... find healing for... provide for... myself (and my kids).

Many want to blame my friend for not coming clean from jump regarding her affair. I'm convinced that the reason there is no sacrament of confession in much institutional religion is because there is no sacrament of forgiveness. We just don't have the tools to embrace brokenness, and we're too inhibited by bad theology. We believe we have a divine obligation to hand out scarlet letters, though we know that's not love. We do it even when it makes no sense--even when everything inside us cries out for something better--even to ourselves. It's tragic.

One of the major obstacles to loving better, I believe, is what we rehearse when we gather together. We rehearse karma instead of grace, "righteous" indignation instead of forgiveness, doctrine instead of faith. Don't get me wrong. Karma is legitimate and probably the best human beings can hope to apprehend in their own strength. But the way of Jesus is predicated on the hope of living beyond one's own strength. Nonetheless, we don't rehearse such victory, only the pitifulness of being "a sinner in need of saving" week after week when it's time for the alter call.

The question that comes to my mind as I watch these tragedies take shape time and time again--or hear people defend the structures that facilitate them--is "How is that working for us?" Don't get me wrong. I don't have all the answers, but I know the reason why few are asking Christianity for its take on the matter. Whether we've been blessed with any answers or not, how we live in committed relationship isn't working any better than those who claim not our sense of accountability. And that breaks my heart, for I know the way of Jesus is better than that.

Labels: , , , , ,